100%-ε of the movements aimed at preserving the future of humanity require sacrificing time/energy/money for the common good. This positive energy encounters an even greater energy of short-term individual benefit, power in the form of capitalism, corruption (ethical, moral, or legal), etc.
It is normal for this to feel like hitting a wall and to be discouraging. Rather than hitting the wall, we propose here to go through the door! This is a solution that makes it more individually profitable to participate than not to participate, and it is valid for everyone starting now.
Perhaps you think that long-term good is incompatible with individual interests ? Yet, this is the purpose of a society of individuals: having rules that promote the common good. But current societies violate this implicit and fundamental rule of promoting the common good in the long term. This stems from the fact that they are the result of an evolution made of additions as circumstances dictated. Here we are recreating a society based on entirely different and much more solid principles.
To carry out a large project, a high standard of quality is needed. That is why, rather than directly presenting the ideas, we suggest that you learn to solve the problem yourself (with good help nonetheless). To do this the research is broken down into question/study/answer, so you just need to do each part yourself before reading what we propose. Moving things forward toward life can be pleasant and aesthetic, and above all, you will see that with a little method, you are very strong. And indeed, we need strong people here.
This site is a centralized starting point for a system that will become increasingly decentralized as collective intelligence techniques are incorporated. But you can already participate.
Rule 1 of the method: Ask a simple and well-contextualized question. It’s very simple, but it helps to think clearly. Try doing this on the question that concerns us here before reading the solution we propose.
Of course, we advance in small steps, but we don't go to the moon as we go to our kitchen. Let's now apply the second rule: List the constraints on the solution.Before starting, there is a deeper rule worth knowing, which is the result of the experience of many researchers in mathematics and physics: great is the aesthetic. This rule may seem unnecessary or mystical, but it guides towards boldness and beauty, not out of pretension, but through the observation of deep realities. That's why it's good to give time to thought and dreams; the mind is fantastic when space is left for aesthetics.As usual, we invite you to reflect before reading the version proposed here.
Is it a lot and seems impossible ? That's normal; real research is like that, hard but fantastic when you find it. Let's go to our third rule: Model. History repeats itself, but also phenomena and structures in various forms and at different scales. We are often stuck in a way of seeing things where simple things can seem complicated. Models allow us to understand the various aspects from another angle. As usual, etc. , the version proposed here.
Modeling shows us that the change to be made is large in scope and that it is necessary for humanity to build the biological equivalent of a mind to cope with great complexity, to act effectively and in a coordinated manner. It is necessary to use the term "mind" and not "government" because it is a system spread across the entire population and sophisticated, including, for example, knowledge, research, and decision-making. This raises several questions because we have many differences compared to a biological organism.
But before that, a practical remark: through the top navigation bar, you have access to the site map, the page table of contents, the path of the pages , and the child pages.
We now have the broad outlines of a decentralized and intelligent decision-making system. But, as with our brain (and any complex system), it is necessary to properly address secondary questions to avoid pitfalls.